Thursday, March 22, 2012

"October Baby" Gets it Wrong

October Baby is the latest feel good film from the Christian film industry.  I loathe the premise behind this movie.  Lets break it down shall we?  A note: there are plenty of spoilers in this review.

If you want the quick version of my criticism it is this: This film is full of adoption cliches that are largely believed by society, mainly Christian society.  It once again proves that the telling of a story to propagate a pro-life agenda is more important to filmmakers than finding out the intricacies of adoption and portraying them in a realistic light. 

The protagonist of “October Baby” is named Hannah.  She is an aspiring actress that finds out though a series of events that she is adopted.  Let me repeat this: a full grown woman does not know she is adopted.  This rarely happens today.  This is an idea that takes adoption back fifty years when it was shameful to adopt, and therefore must be kept a secret.  It propagates the blank slate theory that says that adoptive parents can mold a child to their family just like the child was biologically theirs, so it is not necessary to tell the child they are adopted.  This has been proven not to be the case, we now know that biology forms a great deal of who a child is as well as nurture.  It is not just appearance that gets passed down from mother to child.  And yet the film makers make their first move in propagating old adoption myths and stereotypes thus setting the tone for dated ideas about adoption, adoptees, birth mothers, and even adoptive parents.  


Hannah finds out that she was adopted because she collapses following a play and the ensuing medical tests that are the result.  When Hannah confronts her adoptive parents they admit that she was born early and she was adopted.  It frustrates me here to no end that the adoptive parents hid medical information from their own daughter.  Even as an adult, they kept important medical information from an adoptee thus treating her as perpetual child.  This is something that adoptees know all to well, being treated as children.  Adoptees are denied their original birth certificate and therefore have no access to their medical history.  Once again other people have decided for the adoptee what is important for them, something that those of us that are not adopted will never have to struggle with.  Yet the film doesn’t seem to be about the anger that Hannah has at her adoptive parents for lying to her and keeping secrets from her, it’s about forgiving her birthmother.

“October Baby” shows adoptive parents as insecure people that need to hide secrets instead of the post-modern adoptive parent that often realize how important identity is in a child.  Most modern adoptive parents know that even though biology might be threatening to them, the emotional well-being of their adopted child is more important than any insecurity they have.  Sure eighteen years ago in 1994, when Hannah was supposedly born, open adoption was new and semi-open adoption was being touted as the perfect solution because open adoption seemed scary to many.  Regardless of that fact, in 1994, there were hundreds of books out about raising an adopted child, and none of those advocated lying to your adopted child and telling them they were yours biologically.  There were even a few book that talked about fully open adoption, agencies touted semi-open as healthy alternative.  Instead of doing research about adoptive options and attitudes in 1994, the filmmakers took adoption and adoptive parent’s attitudes back to the 1960‘s to suit their pro-life agenda.

When the adoptive parents reveal to Hannah that she is adopted they also reveal that she is the result of a botched abortion.  Here is where I personally take the biggest issue with this movie.  Yes, this is a possible story.  Yes, there are women that have abortions that do not work and the result is the mother giving up their child for adoption.  But this story line?  It makes me angry.  The vast majority of birth mothers love their children.  The vast majority of birth mothers did not consider abortion for their child.  In 1994 the preponderance of women giving up their children for adoption where white, middle class, christian, nineteen year old college freshman, that were told by the church that adoption was the right thing to do.  These women were sent to maternity homes, they were kept in their parents houses away from prying eyes, they were told to be quiet and that they needed to pay penance for their sin of fornication by giving up their child for adoption.  The majority of these girls in 1994 were strong pro-life Christian women who only considered abortion if their mothers took them to an abortion clinic to keep the shame away from them. 

I get angry when the church and pro-lifers say that adoption is the alternative to abortion.  It is not.  Life is the alternative to abortion.  Adoption is the alternative to parenting.  These are two separate decisions that should not be made at the same time.  Every woman that has ever been in a crisis pregnancy knows that first you decide if you want to have and abortion or not, then you decide what you are going to do with the baby once you decide to let the baby live.  Once again, adoption is not the alternative to abortion. 

Hannah goes on road trip to find her birth mother.  Once she finds her, she is rejected by her.  I admit, not an uncommon story.  It is however not always true.  Reunion is often longed for by birth mothers, sought after, hoped for, dreamed about, and generally wanted.  Of course that would complicate the movie too much, it is much easier to fall back on the “birth mother moves on with her life and forgets about the child” way of thinking.  From experience I can tell you that that is almost never true.  It is now known that giving up your child for adoption produces trauma in most women.  Birth mothers often have PTSD, need therapy, or have lifelong issues because of relinquishment.  Often rejection during reunion is because a birth mother’s coping mechanisms became overwhelmed during post placement and she needed to shut down and shut out all memories to emotionally survive.  Birth mothers do not forget, we do not simply move on.  Healing is a process that really is never fully complete, pain, loss, and grief for most of us are part of our daily lives.  It becomes bricks that we carry around with us and we learn to carry them, thus becoming stronger people, but yet so bogged down by the weight of it all.  

There is a scene in this movie were Hannah’s birth mother is carrying a little girl.  It is estimated that 40% of birth mothers go on to have secondary infertility and are never able to have children, some just choose not to, the trauma being too much for them.  It false the idea that birth mothers can "just have another baby."

In conclusion, “October Baby” proves that it is pro-life propaganda instead of a honest portrayal of adoption.  It makes me sad that adoptees are going to go to this movie and once again hear the myths and stereotypes that they are all too familiar with.  It makes me sad that people will see this movie and think they know about adoption instead of an accurate portrayal of what adoption really is.  It is upsetting that once again birth mothers will be vilified and yet at the same time portrayed as heroes for giving their child life.  It angers me that this will be a catalyst for someone to adopt, not knowing the realities of adoption. 

October Baby is just another film that gets adoption wrong.

14 comments:

White Sugar Brown Sugar by Rachel Garlinghouse said...

Hi, Heather. This is Rachel (lovetowrite---used to be). Jenni shared your blog post on FB. I love that you talk about how adoption isn't the "solution" to all crisis pregnancies and that a woman who is considering abortion should just choose an adoption instead (when, in fact, as you share, it's just not that simple). Good job!

White Sugar Brown Sugar by Rachel Garlinghouse said...

by the way, i blog about adoption too: www.whitesugarbrownsugar.com

Nanaiya said...

As an parent to seven children, two of which happen to be adopted, I found some of your comments positive, others not so much.

In the movie October baby, a child whose biological chose abortion and ended up with a live baby. Would YOU protect your child from this knowledge? For myself personally, yes, I would. Would I share about the adoption? Of course, and adoption is just ONE way to build a family.

You state that many women who CHOOSE (my words instead of "give a child up a child for adoption) adoption for their children suffer from PTSD and require life long therapy. Are you aware that many women who CHOOSE abortion suffer from PTSD and depression? Are you aware of their much higher incidence of breast cancer as well? I'm not an expert, but I think it's possible that that sadness and grief stems from not being in the position to parent and that is normal.

Yes, the alternative to abortion is life, and the alternative to abortion is what exactly? The reality is that abortion results in a dead baby, birth (hopefully) results in a live baby and the chance of life. And having been given that chance by my own mother, I could never choose the alternative.

I thank God every day for birth parents who choose LIFE and HOPE.

Shelley said...

I want to say thank you for your perspective of adoption and for sharing your experience with us about adoption. I especially appreciate how you separate the decision about abortion being a decision on life and the decision about adoption being about parenting. Very enlightening.
However, I think you really missed the mark on reviewing this movie. I think you focused on one part of this movie and the movie was about so much more than just adoption or abortion.
I think this movie handled the things they did the way they did to tell a story of one family and how the experiences of this family effected so many people. I don't think they were saying that this is how abortion or adoption should be or is handled in most circumstances. This is how it was handled in this circumstance. There were so many extenuating things that happened to contribute to where the family was at this point in time that it is totally understandable that they handled it the way they did.
I did not go away from this movie thinking that this is how all adoptive parents handle their adoption or that this is how it should be done. I walked away from the movie thinking that this movie was about how we all have a story to tell and we all need to tell our story in some way or fashion. Why else would so many people be blogging today?
It was also about finding our way in this world, belonging, realizing that the people in our life are going to disappoint us and that we can forgive, and be forgiven. It is a movie of redemption. I would suggest that you see the movie again with an open mind and heart and see what else it is all about.
Did they get adoption wrong, I don't think so. I think the title of your post is a little misleading. "October Baby" got so many things right.
Blessings,

Kristine said...

Hi Heather,

Thank for for your discussion of the Church's inadequacy in addressing some of the issues surrounding adoption. I agree, we need to do a much better job.

But, I must say that your criticism of the movie "October Baby" seemed misdirected. The movie's main point was not meant to deal with the issues surrounding the church's failure to support biological mothers and the difficulties with adopting their babies (although they made a great case for how families shouldn't deal with it,) but it was obviously meant to support the view that every life is meaningful and worth fighting for. The movie did a good job in this regard, and is definitely worth seeing.

Please see this link to see an amazing woman named Gianna Jessen, a saline abortion survivor. She's one of the most inspiring speakers I've ever heard: http://www.squidoo.com/Gianna-Jessen

Thank you.
Blessings, Kristine Magee

Lothlórien said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lothlórien said...

Hello all, first thank you for your comments. I appreciate you taking the time to read my blog post. I'd like to address a couple of the issues that a few of you have made:

Stephanie, I believe that it is every child’s right to know their heritage. In the fictional case of Hannah it was important to her health to know that she was a product of a botched abortion. At 18 years old she needed to know her history so she could tell her doctors, so that they knew how to treat her. When it comes time, I will tell my twins their story even if it is painful to all of us. They deserve to know, just as all of us deserve to know our origins, good or bad.

I hope you inferred from this post that I am a birth mother. I personally hate the term birth mother and choose the term first mother. I also prefer the term “gave up my children for adoption” because that is what I did. I didn’t have a choice in the matter, I was forced into giving them up because of circumstances beyond my control, and none of those had to do with me being an unfit mother. The judge at my hearing used the phrase “give up your legal right to your children” because that is what I did. When I gave up my children I also gave up the right to have them call me mommy, to wake up at 2am for night feedings, to kiss their boo-boos, and I gave up their first day of kindergarten. I gave up 16 years of birthdays, and will give up move. I believe that I am entitled to use the language I feel appropriate after living and breathing this for sixteen years.

Yes, I get angry when you thank me for giving my children life. It upsets me that you think that I would ever think of killing any of my children, please don’t say that to me. I valued my all five of my children’s lives from the moment I found out about them. I still value the life of my 8 week old fetus that in now in the ground and morn that child. All my children are precious to me planned or not, alive or dead, the ones that call me Mommy and the ones that call me by my first name.

Shelly and Kristine, I am a birth mom and some of my closest friends are adoptive moms. I have spent hundreds of hours researching adoption and the intricacies of it, I lived it for years, and still live it every day of my life. I realize that the main theme of this movie was not about adoption, but if you can’t tell the subject of adoption is near and dear to my heart. It hurts me that there were so many fallacies in this movie about the subject of adoption, so many stereotypes, so many old ways of thinking. Think about it this way; if there was a movie that had something near and dear to your heart that got so many things wrong wouldn’t you be upset too, no matter how good the movie? Let’s take the Da Vinci Code for example. The main thrust of that movie was not about Christianity, but they got so many things wrong about Jesus according to the Christian faith that people were very very upset. That is how I feel. KWIM?

Finally I have heard of Gianna Jessen, I wish the filmmakers had told her story. It is much more powerful than any contrived story could ever be.

I hope that answers some questions.

Cammyklee said...

Hey love your perspective here. but most of all...movie aside...I love your heart for women that have chosen adoption for their child/children. I spend a lot of time working hard to edify people in our world today on the TRUTH behind "birthmoms" and what we represent. I work hard to break the stereotypes that we are often falling victim of. Here is a piece I wrote some time ago on this very topic. I hope you enjoy it. xo

Cammy Lee

http://www.lifeisgoodintennessee.blogspot.com/2011/01/breaking-stereotypes-against.html

David B said...

The red flag went up for me on some of those same issues during the movie, but I felt they were dealt well over the last 20 minutes of the movie.

You see the adoptive father remorseful for not being more open earlier in her life, and you see the emotions of a birth mother still feeling the loss of her first child.

Also keep in mind, this is set in the early-90s when open adoption was still a fairly new concept. And this was a special situation with the abortion impact and the loss of a brother. As an adoptive dad, I have no problem being open with my kids, but I would struggle about how to share those harsher parts of the story.

Kristen Howerton said...

Thank you for this honest and insightful review. I've only seen the trailer but had similar thoughts. It's frustrating when archaic adoption ideas become the crucible for oversimplified pro-life propaganda, and unfortunately that's what this movie looks like to me.

Adri Ramirez said...

Stefanie- I'm just hoping that it's not truly believed that abortion leads to breast cancer? There is an extreme difference between correlation and cause-and-effect.

Other than that, thanks for the review. We all have an option to see the movie for ourselves and decide if it fits into our lives and our opinions of things. Thank you for sharing about something that is so near and dear to your heart!!

xoxo, adri

RAM said...

Wow, not commenting on the movie but on others comments. Since I didn't see the movie I think it is a bit presumptuous to make comments about what the film portrays or doesn't portrays. I read the "review" and comments to get an idea of what the movie was about and find out if I wanted to invest time and money to see it.
It concerns me that people would post opinions that have not even seen it. Some of these responses are "too cool" or "progressive" for their own good. Enough with the high and mighty and lets try to work together to bring a true voice to adoption. Everyone's story/life/journey is different and there is room for ALL perspectives.

savannahcarson said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Stan Williams said...

Dear Heather and commenters to this blog post on October Baby. I'm a film writer-producer working on a story that deals with adoption and IVF, and in a minor way abortion. I would relish your comments on the story I'm writing. Would you contact me so I can send you something to read? Greatly appreciated.